Very difficult to understand what the point of this piece is. I’m guessing that if you would have written an article instead of a graphic, the title would have been something along the lines of “What Went Wrong With UChicago Hookups?” I don’t see how your graphic is addressing that question at all.
Maybe it isn’t supposed to be addressing any questions (after all, it’s not an essay). Perhaps the point is just to tell a story. But then, why is the story intertwined with all these pseudo-reflective questions about social awkwardness and the UChicago mentality which are never even addressed in any sense?
Very difficult to understand what the point of this piece is. I’m guessing that if you would have written an article instead of a graphic, the title would have been something along the lines of “What Went Wrong With UChicago Hookups?” I don’t see how your graphic is addressing that question at all.
Maybe it isn’t supposed to be addressing any questions (after all, it’s not an essay). Perhaps the point is just to tell a story. But then, why is the story intertwined with all these pseudo-reflective questions about social awkwardness and the UChicago mentality which are never even addressed in any sense?