A UChicago United for Palestine (UCUP) rally saw three protesters arrested and physical altercations between protesters and officers. Earlier, protesters locked Cobb Gate using a bike lock despite UCPD’s efforts to keep the gate open. During the rally multiple police officers used pepper spray and batons. Protesters damaged UCPD vehicles and kicked at least one officer.
The rally, which began with a walkout at 2:30 p.m., morphed into a brawl that involved at least 200 University- and community-affiliated protesters, 20 University of Chicago Police Department (UCPD) officers, and 30 Chicago Police Department (CPD) officers.
Deans-on-Call informed UCPD at approximately 2:15 p.m., that the University had “zero tolerance” for excessive noise before attempting to hand out warning cards to protest leaders using bullhorns to lead chants on the quad at 2:45 p.m. The cards read, “FINAL WARNING: This card serves to inform you or your student organization that your conduct is violating policies outlined in the Student Manual.” The cards also contained four QR codes linked to relevant University policies, which were updated in advance of the beginning of the academic year. Protesters refused to accept the cards.
Chants at the rally included, “We know where your money goes, bombing Gaza schools and homes” and “resistance is justified when people are occupied.” A protest leader said that the University “claims that they care about our safety and our wellbeing, but in the last year these two-faced administrators have shown their true faces.”
At approximately 3 p.m., protesters marched from the center of the quad and proceeded through the Hull and Cobb Gates on the north end. Once all protesters had passed through Cobb Gate, protesters pushed the gate closed and secured it with a bike lock despite police attempts to stop them. They also hung a banner on the gate that read “Free Palestine” and “Hands Off Lebanon.”
By this point, the protest had grown to include over 150 people, spilling out onto East 57th Street. Protesters allowed space for cars to pass through, but UCPD patrol cars blocked the street on both ends.
Protesters told police officers “Pigs go home” and chanted “Intifada, intifada, long live the intifada.”
At 3:15 p.m., protesters left Cobb Gate and proceeded north on S. Ellis Avenue. They stopped in front of the Nuclear Energy Sculpture next to the Regenstein Library, at which point some protesters threw paint on the statue and wrote graffiti in the surrounding area that read “Free Gaza,” “hands off Lebonan” [sic], and “fuck the bombs.” CPD officers arrived on scene, joining at least 20 UCPD officers. Some were in riot gear and carried batons and zip-ties.
At approximately 3:30 p.m., the protest moved further north along the street, stopping between Ratner Athletics Center and the Court Theater. Police searched for and then tackled and detained one protester, whom they put into a patrol car. Protesters attempted to prevent the detainment, physically confronting officers. The Maroon was unable to confirm why that protester was detained.
Other protesters began chanting “Let him go!” and surrounded the patrol car that held the detained protester. An officer attempted to drive the UCPD patrol car away from the scene but was blocked by the crowd of protesters. Officers and protesters continued to push against each other.
Another protester struck the side mirror of a separate police car several times with what appeared to be a rock and then rejoined the crowd.
As tensions escalated, a third protester kicked a CPD officer in the back of his leg. Officers attempted to detain the protester, hitting him with a baton. They chased him briefly and tackled him halfway down the block, at which point they detained him and placed him into a patrol car.
Officers used pepper spray on protesters, who were seen afterward rubbing and washing their eyes with water. One student told the Maroon that he was pepper sprayed by an officer who had “harassed students at the encampment.” A Maroon reporter witnessed a UCPD officer inadvertently pepper spraying a Chicago Police Department Captain, an incident which the UCPD officer later apologized for.
At approximately 3:45 p.m., protesters began dispersing north along South Ellis Avenue, south towards the quad, and through the SMART Museum courtyard. One CPD officer remarked to gathered officers, “that was fun for a little while.” Shortly after, CPD and UCPD officers also dispersed. By 4 p.m., the lock on Cobb Gate was removed and the gate was reopened.
By 5 p.m., Facility Services had begun using pressure washers to remove the graffiti surrounding the Nuclear Energy sculpture.
Eman Abdelhadi, assistant professor of Comparative Human Development and a member of Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine (formerly Faculty for Justice in Palestine), was present at the protest and spoke to the Maroon in an interview after the protesters had dispersed.
“It was an enormous escalation,” Abdelhadi said of police officers’ response to the protest. “This was a relatively small rally and march. I understand that… there was a little bit of spray painting or that kind of thing, but the University escalated it to bodily harm. The police were extremely brutal… I will never forget having to pour water into a student’s eyes as the student said, ‘I can’t see, I can’t see, I can’t see’ after having been pepper sprayed.”
In a statement to the Maroon, the University confirmed the arrests of three protesters after protesters locked Cobb Gate, vandalized University property, and pushed officers. “At approximately 3:20 p.m. Friday, a group of protesters who had marched from a rally on campus used locks to block access to campus through a gate on 57th Street, and began spray-painting buildings and public art near the corner of Ellis Avenue and 57th Street. Officers from the University of Chicago Police Department (UCPD) and the Chicago Police Department (CPD) responded to the scene. Protesters instigated confrontations with police by physically surrounding a police car, further vandalizing and damaging property, blocking the public road, and striking police officers who responded. UCPD arrested two individuals – one for criminal damage and one for battery to a police officer. The Chicago Police Department arrested one individual for battery to a police officer.”
According to a University spokesperson, “the University of Chicago is fundamentally committed to upholding the rights of protesters to express their views on any issue. At the same time, University policies make it clear that protests cannot jeopardize public safety, disrupt the University’s operations, or involve the destruction of property.”
Today’s protest comes at the tail end of National Students for Justice in Palestine’s “Week of Rage,” which commemorates the anniversary of the start of the Israel-Hamas War and encompasses the one year anniversary of Hamas’ October 7 attacks on Israel. Sundown Friday also marks the beginning of Yom Kippur, the end of the Jewish High Holy Days.
In a press release following the events, UCUP discussed the day’s events. “When UCPD and CPD came at protestors with batons, attempted to run people over, and mass pepper-sprayed in a drastic escalation of police violence from prior protests at the University, the crowd responded instinctively, recognizing that we must protect each other from the university’s agents of brutality,” the statement read.
“The people who spontaneously decided to surround a squad car, confront two police departments, and not back down in the face of pepper spray and batons realized that UCPD and CPD stand between us and divestment: the police are an occupying force, and the solidarity movement for a free Palestine will have to go through them.”
At the time of publication, UCPD had not responded to a request for comment and CPD could not be reached for comment.
– Eva McCord, Co-Editor-in-Chief; Anu Vashist, Managing Editor; Zachary Leiter, Deputy Managing Editor; Tiffany Li and Katherine Weaver, News Editors; Sabrina Chang, Deputy News Editor; Nathaniel Rodwell-Simon, Senior News Reporter
Editor’s note, October 22, 2024: This article has been updated to reflect a comment from UCUP. UCPD and CPD have not responded to requests for comments.
Gul / Oct 24, 2024 at 9:37 pm
UChicago has turned into a fascist institution, arresting and using violence on its own students who are rightfully trying to end the university’s investments in genocide. No university should be investing in an apartheid state and it’s genocidal colonial regime. As an alumnus I am ashamed. Shame on UChicago.
Joe / Oct 12, 2024 at 10:19 pm
I’m not sure why this is complicated. The university has rules, if you break them you get in trouble. It’s really pretty simple.
Try spray painting the university in your beloved Tehran and see what happens to you???
Isaac Newton / Oct 13, 2024 at 10:48 am
Bullseye
Ship them all off to their beloved Tehran and get some lawn chairs to watch all the fun the Iranian Govt would have with them…experiments with gravity….the IRGC just wants to independently confirm that the gravitational constant of 9.8m/s2 holds true with humans.
Heywood Jeblowmi / Oct 12, 2024 at 1:42 pm
Arrest, prosecute and incarcerate these antisemitic scumbags!!!
Send in an army of men in blue to straighten things out…
Publish the names of these Students, Faculty and Staff so future employers will know who they are and can behave accordingly.
If any of these violent protestors are current students EXPEL THEM IMMEDIATELY!
NB: Dear Admissions Staff….Please keep a closer eye on who you admit. The University does not need to be infected with these woke lunatics.
grad student / Oct 12, 2024 at 1:34 am
If you were to ask any of the protestors: which is better, today’s situation or a public meeting with Alivisatos over their concerns, they will say the latter. It’s he who insists on an anti-intellectual path of violence. Here’s a simple test: try emailing Alivisatos and fellow admins about your concerns — I have over the last 12 months and never got a single reply. Meanwhile, Alivisatos has the nerve to make public statements lamenting how student critics are rejecting the path of dialogue and civility. The reality is he is violently covering up violent investments because the last thing he wants is for students here to think critically and follow the money. His position is that UChicago can cherish education and free speech while investing in the bombing of schools and universities in Gaza. If that position doesn’t quite sit well with you, reader, you’ve begun to understand why people are protesting so much.
Mike Hunt / Oct 12, 2024 at 1:46 pm
You are too woke to understand your stupidity.
Letting you into The University was a massive mistake. (Admissions take note)
Pack your bags and move along while you remain infected with the woke mind virus.
PLEASE do the world a favor and publish your name here so future employers won’t be duped into hiring you.
what? / Oct 12, 2024 at 8:54 pm
The claim to cherish education and civil discourse is incompatible with investing in weapons manufacturers that help the Israeli army destroy educational facilities. I’m irrelevant, my name or wokeness is irrelevant, my job prospects are irrelevant, how stupid you may feel I am is irrelevant.
Re Ality / Oct 13, 2024 at 11:12 am
It turns out its not..
Wars and conquest decide dominance.
Weapons are CRITICAL to protecting and defending Western Civilization, and its achievements from internal and external savages who seek to destroy it.
Lunatic ideologies, Nazism, Communism, Sharia Law, Wokism, are but a sample of the “ideas” that the best weapon systems help us eliminate and send into oblivion.
And your mention of Israel’s destruction of “educational institutions” I take it you mean the ones loaded with weapons, fighters, control and command centers, etc….yes if those are the ones you are referring to, then yes they go bye bye…
Be quiet. / Oct 13, 2024 at 1:31 am
Another conspiracy-laden rant, dripping with self-righteous indignation. Of course, it’s easier to blame Alivisatos for an “anti-intellectual path of violence” rather than acknowledge that these protests have been anything but intellectual. Let’s not pretend that vandalism, assaulting officers, and disrupting campus life is somehow the hallmark of reasoned discourse. The idea that Alivisatos is violently covering up anything is laughable at best. But sure, keep spinning that narrative to justify the mob’s behavior.
” Here’s a simple test: try emailing Alivisatos and fellow admins about your concerns — I have over the last 12 months and never got a single reply.
Naturally, the President of the university is supposed to drop everything and personally respond to every single student grievance that lands in his inbox. Riiight. The idea that Alivisatos not replying to your emails is some grand evidence of his malicious intent is absurd. He’s running an entire institution, not sitting around waiting to validate every half-baked protester theory.
(As an aside, this ridiculous line of reasoning perfectly captures the entitled mindset of today’s protest crowd, proof that you’re overestimating your own importance in the grand scheme of things.)
And this talk about “following the money” and UChicago supposedly investing in the bombing of schools? Classic deflection. The truth is, the protests aren’t about critical thinking—they’re about performative outrage, and provocateurs like you are more interested in stirring up chaos than actually engaging in meaningful dialogue.
Geo Washington / Oct 13, 2024 at 11:15 am
Well said
? / Oct 13, 2024 at 1:14 pm
Alivisatos’ hypocrisy — in claiming that he’s the one who wants dialogue while turning his back on it and sending out cops to arrest critics of his leadership and university policy — has fueled anger and will continue to. You want to focus on the symptom rather than the cause, which is unintellectual. The more Alivisatos relies on the idea that his door is always open to talk to people with inconvenient ideas, the more it warrants scrutiny over how he has reacted to groups and individuals who have made consistent efforts towards getting a public meeting. Don’t be misled: this is about a tiny subset of those on campus — people in power — who are against free and informed debate over UChicago’s investments. That is against the spirit of a university and against the spirit of international law. See Maroon article on UChicago’s investments being tied to weapons manufacturers and fossil fuels (can’t link to it here); is your position that this article shouldn’t have been printed? If not, why oppose true transparency? Why scrutinize what some random kid in a group of 150 does while giving a complete pass to the most powerful figure at an elite, ultra-wealthy institution?
Every reply to such critiques is focusing on how I must be a person of color with a rotted brain who was let in only due to affirmative action, and how cops should lock me up and throw away the key — if this is how UChicago people engage with the issues of our day, like the concept of responsible investing and the proper role of a university in relation to Ukraine vs. Palestine (see Alivisatos’ discrepancy handlings of the two), I’m not impressed.
If you are so sure, despite evidence to the contrary, that UChicago’s investments are tied to little kids and health workers and elderly people being subjected to ethnic cleansing, there’s no reason for you to respond so emotionally to the simple call for transparency.
Imbecile Hunting / Oct 13, 2024 at 5:57 pm
You are simply an imbecile. I can’t believe you made it past the Admissions staff.
“Every reply to such critiques is focusing on how I must be a person of color with a rotted brain who was let in only due to affirmative action, and how cops should lock me up and throw away the key — if this is how UChicago people engage with the issues of our day, like the concept of responsible investing and the proper role of a university in relation to Ukraine vs. Palestine (see Alivisatos’ discrepancy handlings of the two), I’m not impressed. ”
Good, I’m glad you are not impressed. Are we supposed to look to you and your woke freak show ilk for enlightened guidance as experts on “responsible investing” or the “proper role of a university in relation to Ukraine vs. Palestine”…ahhh……NO!
If you or your ilk are involved in breaking University rules, policies, or procedures, or if you engage in vandalism or violence, I pray you get expelled, arrested, prosecuted and incarcerated (for a long time).
I also think your mug shot and name should be emblazoned on the internet FOREVER so all people will always know what a woke lunatic (anti-Semite) you are.
You will need to learn to repeat, “do you want fries with that?”
Less Nonsense Please / Oct 24, 2024 at 8:47 pm
I know you understand what a dialogue is, but I don’t think you really understand that both sides in a dialogue on a subject that may require compromise must be willing to compromise.
The University isn’t forcing you or anyone else to engage in the type of non-constructive behavior that occurred October 11.
The University isn’t required to agree to UCUP’s demands, and no dialogue will occur until UCUP makes it clear they are willing to try to find common ground.
This isn’t a game and for the rest of us, it isn’t funny anymore. You can’t use bullhorns and rule violations to force the UC to meet your demands.
Please share with us one of your letters to President Alivisatos.
Perhaps we can assist you in rephrasing your letter to the President in a way that expresses your willingness to discuss compromise.
anon / Oct 11, 2024 at 9:00 pm
it should not be controversial to say that having five armed officers tackle and drag away a student for throwing paint is deranged and shameful for the university
Ma Balz / Oct 12, 2024 at 1:51 pm
Ahhhh yes, you are right. It should have been 10 heavily armed officers, and they should prosecute and incarcerate this “student”.
Hopefully after the conviction, we can bucket this ” former student” as a “former admissions mistake”.
You're not very bright. / Oct 13, 2024 at 1:36 am
It’s always amusing when wokenites clutch their pearls over an incident like this, conveniently omitting context. A student vandalizes property. Another assaults a police officer. And when they face consequences, suddenly it’s “deranged and shameful” that the university uses force to stop them. Get real. What’s truly deranged is the idea that these shrieksters should be above the law, free to engage in destruction with impunity.
Let’s not pretend that this is just about one isolated incident. This kind of DEI-fueled entitlement has been building for years, where students feel emboldened to act out, confident they’ll be coddled because the university has long prioritized identity politics over real accountability. The indulgence of this behavior—born out of affirmative action and a DEI agenda that fosters victimhood—has created a culture where even criminal acts are seen as justifiable forms of “protest.”
Indeed, what is shameful, “anon,” isn’t the university’s response; it’s the fact that students now expect to act with immunity, all in the name of the latest cause.
Roberto Carlos / Oct 11, 2024 at 8:34 pm
Why are we blurring their faces again?
student / Oct 12, 2024 at 11:31 am
Why are we still blurring UChicago’s investments? Not even far-right Zionists on campus are claiming that the absence of transparency and the absence of informed debate make Jews safer. If they had any case to make for that, personally I would listen. The actual situation is a handful of admins insisting that the use of university funds to bomb of other people’s classrooms is none of our business. As far as I can tell, that goes against everything this uni is supposed to stand for.
The anti-woke / Oct 13, 2024 at 1:41 am
Behold: the classic pivot—linking transparency on university investments to some imagined conspiracy about UChicago funding the bombing of classrooms. It’s impressive how effortlessly you weave wild accusations with a complete disregard for reality.
Let us be clear: the notion that UChicago is using its funds to bomb schools is so detached from facts that it barely warrants a response.
And as for the call for transparency, let us not pretend this is really about “informed debate” or “making Jews safer.” The real issue here is the relentless demand for universities to align with the political causes of a vocal minority—no matter how absurd the claims may be. The administration’s refusal to entertain every conspiracy theory from the wokenati doesn’t mean they’re hiding something nefarious; it means they’re refusing to be dragged into the ideological quicksand that you and your ilk are constantly stirring up.