Dear President Alivisatos,
As instructors at the University of Chicago, we object—in the strongest possible terms—to your decision to deploy armed police against a peaceful encampment of our students in the early hours of Tuesday, May 7. We object in particular to the administration’s weaponization of the University’s much-vaunted Kalven Report and Chicago Principles, which it has used to vindicate its decision to take a deliberate stance against the peaceful encampment and, ultimately, to order the police to break it up. In choosing this course of action, the administration has elected to abandon its own principles of neutrality and the protection of free speech. It is as if sincere, thoughtful, and passionate disagreement were a mark of moral failure among our students.
Since the encampment began, the administration has turned to the Kalven Report to restrict, rather than protect, speech; to vindicate a narrow, limited, and self-interested interpretation of its principles; and to assert its rights over those of the students. This appeal reached the height of its absurdity when you explained in the Wall Street Journal that it was the Kalven Report’s principle of institutional neutrality that actually required the administration to walk away from negotiations and extinguish the students’ speech. Here, the Kalven Report’s principles are twisted beyond recognition to justify the refusal of dialogue in favor of the forceful repression of dissent.
The order for campus police to suppress students’ speech was not a neutral act under the terms of the Kalven Report. The authors of the Kalven Report specified that the University’s commitment to institutional neutrality must be buttressed by an expansive understanding of both faculty and students’ rights to protest. The authors wrote that the University’s commitment to neutrality “arises out of respect for free inquiry and the obligation to cherish a diversity of viewpoints.” They clarified: “This neutrality as an institution has its complement in the fullest freedom for its faculty and students as individuals to participate in political action and social protest. It finds its complement, too, in the obligation of the university to provide a forum for the most searching and candid discussion of public issues.” The administration had many options available to it short of bringing physical force to bear on our students, from endorsing a broad and generous construal of its students’ free-speech rights to mere toleration to de-escalation and negotiation. The administration’s choice of the most escalatory option, to suppress the students’ speech, chooses force over persuasion, abandoning the Kalven Report’s clearest ideals.
The administration maintains that it decided to suppress the students’ speech because the protest had become unduly disruptive. In so doing, however, it takes a position against free speech in arrogating to itself power to decide by administrative fiat when enough speech has been heard. The Kalven Report counsels the University to provide the widest possible leeway for protest and dissent. As far as we understand, the encampment did not lead to the cancellation of any classes, access to Levi Hall was not restricted, the area of the Quad that the students were camping on remained traversable, and the University maintained an active presence of both police and security guards. Further, the administration’s own Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Protest and Dissent in 2013 noted that “vocal protest, and demonstrations in particular, are by their nature disruptive” and concluded that “such incidental disruption should not be regarded as a violation of University policy.” The administration’s conclusion that encampment, as a protest strategy, is inherently too disruptive is simply to say that it disfavors this form of speech.
Further, the administration has claimed that its principle of institutional neutrality required it to walk away from negotiations when protestors demanded policies that the administration believes would violate it. But walking away from negotiations does not require subsequently repressing the protestors’ continued speech. Moreover, there is no reason to think that making investment decisions according to the principle of profit maximization is more neutral than making them according to, for example, a basic principle of respect for humanity. We would hope that, were slavery to be reinstated and become maximally profitable, the University would nonetheless refrain from investing in it. Once again, the administration appeals to the principle of institutional neutrality to refuse negotiations, suppress speech, fight transparency, and maintain its financial interests in politically-charged causes.
Over the past several months, a fraught political climate has faced universities with a number of difficult choices. The authors of the Kalven Report were sure to clarify that “the sources of power of a great university should not be misconceived. Its prestige and influence are based on integrity and intellectual competence; they are not based on the circumstance that it may be wealthy, may have political contacts, and may have influential friends.” Here, the administration would do well to heed the report’s clear warning and its prescription to resist outside pressures and defend its commitment to free speech and open inquiry: “From time-to-time instances will arise in which the society, or segments of it, threaten the very mission of the university and its values of free inquiry. In such a crisis, it becomes the obligation of the university as an institution to oppose such measures and actively to defend its interests and its values.” If this administration cannot commit itself to the core mission of the institution of the university as defined by the Kalven Report—“the discovery, improvement, and dissemination of knowledge”—then the Kalven Report loses all meaning.
The University of Chicago often prides itself on being a leader in matters of free speech, and many other peer institutions have followed its lead in adopting the Chicago Principles. On Tuesday morning, the administration gave up this mission, choosing instead to follow behind the panic of peer institutions. This has compromised its commitment to an expansive view of freedom of speech. In using its power to crush protestors’ speech, it turned its back on the very document it now appeals to for an alibi.
While we, the undersigned, may disagree on many of the specific prescriptions of the Kalven Report and reflect a broad diversity of opinion on questions of policy, politics, and effectuating change, we believe that the University’s actions this week are in flagrant contradiction with the principles it claims to cherish, and would hold this belief for any topic that aroused a collective student action of this kind.
Sincerely,
William Levine, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
Daragh Grant, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor, Social Sciences Collegiate Division
Connor B.S. Strobel, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
John P. McCormick, Professor, Political Science
Linda M. G. Zerilli, Charles E. Merriam Distinguished Service Professor, Political Science and the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality
Chiara Cordelli, Professor, Political Science
Alireza Doostdar, Associate Professor of Islamic Studies and the Anthropology of Religion, Divinity School and the College
Duygu Uygun-Tunc, Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
Hoda El Shakry, Assistant Professor of Comparative Literature
Brinton Ahlin, Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences Collegiate Division
Gabriel Winant, Assistant Professor of History
Lisa Wedeen, Mary R. Morton Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and the College
Jason de Stefano, Collegiate Assistant Professor, Harper-Schmidt Fellow
Jonathan Levy, James Westfall Thompson Professor of History and Social Thought
Joy Wang, Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Social Sciences
Eman Abdelhadi, Assistant Professor, Comparative Human Development
Phillip Henry, Collegiate Assistant Professor
Judith Zeitlin, William R. Kenan, Jr Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations and the Committee on Theater and Performance Studies
Tina Post, Assistant Professor of English and Theater and Performance Studies
Isaac Hand, Collegiate Assistant Professor and Harper Schmidt Fellow
Ghenwa Hayek, Associate Professor, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Gabriel Ellis, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Humanities
Thomas C. Holt, James Westfall Thompson Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus
Bruce Lincoln, Caroline E. Haskell Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of History of Religions
Leora Auslander, Rasmussen Professor of Western Civilization in the Departments of Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity, and History
Matthew Harris, Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellow, Divinity School
Colleen M. Grogan, Deborah R. and Edgar D. Jannotta University Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Kenneth Pomeranz, University Professor in History, East Asian Languages and Civilizations, and the College
Andrew Brandel, Associate Instructional Professor
Julian Go, Professor of Sociology
Anne Beal, Senior Lecturer, Social Sciences Collegiate Division
Kaushik Sunder Rajan, Professor of Anthropology
Elham Mireshghi, Assistant Instructional Professor, Divinity School and the College
Olivia Bustion, Teaching Fellow, Divinity School
Uday Jain, Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow in the Committee on Social Thought, Social Sciences Division
Marta Antonetti, Family Life Programs Classroom Assistant, UChicago Laboratory School
Bart Schultz, Senior Lecturer in the Humanities
Larry Svabek, Teaching Fellow, Department of Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity,
Margaret Ross, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor of Creative Writing
Leah Feldman, Associate Professor of Comparative Literature
Kimberly Kay Hoang, Professor of Sociology
Anthony Nicholson, Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science
Julie Y. Chu, Associate Professor of Anthropology
Karlyn J. Gorski, Assistant Instructional Professor, Harris School of Public Policy
Karlos Arregi, Professor, Department of Linguistics
John Proios, Assistant Professor of Philosophy
Sarah Johnson, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor, Program in Law, Letters, and Society
Anand Venkatkrishnan, Assistant Professor, Divinity School and the College
Bill Brown, Karla Scherer Distinguished Service Professor, English Language and LIterature, Visual Arts, the College
Ben Laurence, Instructional Professor, Social Sciences Collegiate Division and the Division of Social Sciences
Na’ama Rokem, Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Comparative Literature
Megan Sullivan, Associate Professor, Department of Art History
Paola Iovene, Associate Professor, Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Gina Samuels, Faculty Director, Center for The Study of Race, Politics and Culture
Elaine Hadley, Professor, English Language and Literature
Agnes Mondragon, Teaching Fellow, Anthropology
Claudia Brittenham, Professor, Art History
Sarah Newman, Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology
Robert L. Kendrick, Prof. Emeritus, Department of Music
Joyce M. Bell, Associate Professor, Race, Diaspora and Indigeneity and Sociology
Hussein Ali Agrama, Associate Professor, Anthropology
Kristen Schilt, Associate Professor, Sociology
Molly K Cunningham, Harper Schmidt Fellow
Jennifer Scappettone, Associate Professor, English, Creative Writing, Romance Languages and Literatures
Jason Grunebaum, Instructional Professor, South Asian Languages and Civilizations
Peter Tinti, Lecturer, Committee on International Relations
Mariam Nawas, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division
Stephen Haswell Todd, Associate Instructional Professor, Humanities Collegiate Division
Jessica H Darrow, Associate Instructional Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Gina Fedock, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Rashauna Johnson, Associate Professor, History
Sharvari Sastry, Harper Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Theater and Performance Studies
Korey Williams, Harper Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Humanities
Amanda Klonsky, Lecturer, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Summerson Carr, Professor, Department of Anthropology and Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Sarah McDaniel, Teaching Fellow in the Humanities, Department of English and Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality
Alida Bouris, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy and Practice
Laura Ring, Southern Asian Studies Librarian
Jade Pagkas-Bather, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health
Faith Hillis, Professor of Russian History
Jennifer Mosley, Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Salikoko S. Mufwene, Professor of Linguistics
M. Ahmed, UChicago staff
Stephan Palmié, Norman and Edna Freehling Professor of Anthropology
Amy Dru Stanley, Associate Professor, Department of History and the Law School
Matthias Staisch, Associate Senior Instructional Professor, Committee on International Relations
Loren Kruger, Professor in English, Comparative Literature, Theatre and Performance Studies, and The College
Ada H. Shissler, Associate Professor, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Cate Fugazzola, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor, Global Studies
Julie Orlemanski, Associate Professor, English
John J. Mearsheimer, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science
W. J. T. Mitchell, Gaylord Donnelley Distinguished Service Professor of English and Art History
Angela S. García, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Travis A. Jackson, Associate Professor of Music
Ralph Austen, Emeritus Professor of History
Geoff Wodtke, Associate Professor of Sociology
Joseph Masco, Samuel N Harper Professor of Anthropology
Carolina López-Ruiz, Professor, Divinity School and Department of Classics
Andreas Glaeser, Professor of Sociology
Yousef Casewit, Associate Professor, Divinity School and the College
Matthew Kruer, Assistant Professor, History and Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity
Maria Angelica Bautista, Senior Research Associate, Harris School of Public Policy
Paula Martin, Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow
Francois Richard, Associate Professor, Anthropology, Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity, and Romance Languages and Literatures
Tanya L. Zakrison, MD, MPH, FACS, FRCSC, Professor of Surgery
Maliha Chishti, Assistant Instructional Professor, Harris School of Public Policy
Chiara Galli, Assistant Professor, Comparative Human Development
Ayman Al-Hendy, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Natacha Nsabimana, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
Daniel Morgan, Professor, Department of Cinema and Media Studies
Kamala Russell, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
Norma M. Field, Robert S. Ingersoll Distinguished Service Professor Emerita, East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Ashish Premkumar, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Daisy Delogu, Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Farah A. Alvi, MD, MS, Clinical Associate of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Elizabeth Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, History
Ruby Rorty, Analyst at the Center for RISC at UChicago
Nell Pach, Writing and Research Advisor
Seth Brodsky, Associate Professor, Music
Baddr Shakhsheer, MD, FACS, FAAP, Assistant Professor of Surgery
Jennifer Cole, Professor, Comparative Human Development
Salomé Aguilera Skvirsky, Associate Professor, Cinema and Media Studies
Anjli Parrin, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School
Neha Bhardwaj, MD MS, Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Carmelle Romain, MD, FACS, FAAP, Assistant Professor of Surgery
Benjamin Saltzman, Associate Professor, English Language and Literature
Daniel Brudney, Professor, Philosophy Department
Catherine Kearns, Assistant Professor, Classics
Julia Henly, Samuel Deutsch Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology
Philip Garboden, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Fred M. Donner, Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern History, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations and the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures
Heather Keenleyside, Associate Professor, English
Anton Ford, Associate Professor of Philosophy
Kai Ihns, Teaching Fellow in the Humanities
Hoyt Long, Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Allyson Nadia Field, Associate Professor, Department of Cinema and Media Studies and the College
Mehrnoush Soroush, Assistant Professor, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures
Kara Ann Hooser, Assistant Instructional Professor, Committee on International Relations
Asim V. Farooq, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Jennifer Pitts, Professor, Political Science and the Committee on Social Thought
Adom Getachew, Professor of Political Science and Race, Diaspora and Indigeneity
Adrienne Brown, Associate Professor of English and Race, Diaspora and Indigeneity
Stephanie Soileau, Assistant Professor of Practice in the Arts, Creative Writing Program
Darby English, Carl Darling Buck Professor, Art History
Haun Saussy, University Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations, and the Committee on Social Thought
Jacob Eyferth, Associate Professor in East Asian Languages and Civilizations and History
Hassan Shah, MD, Associate Professor, Ophthalmology
Steven Rings, Associate Professor, Music
Eléonore Rimbault, Teaching Fellow in the College and Anthropology
Kristine Palmieri, Postdoctoral Researcher at the rank of Instructor, Institute on the Formation of Knowledge
Zhiying Ma, Assistant Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Willemien Otten, Dorothy Grant Maclear Professor of the History of Christianity and Theology
Ariel Fox, Assistant Professor, Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations and Committee on Theater and Performance Studies
Kyeong-Hee Choi, Associate Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations and the College
Sianne Ngai, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of English
Robert Chaskin, McCormick Foundation Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Richard Strier, Frank L. Sulzberger Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in English
Michael Dietler, Professor, Anthropology
Oliver Cussen, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
Zoya Sameen, Teaching Fellow in History, Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity, and the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality
Cathy J. Cohen, David and Mary Winton Green Distinguished Service Professor, Political Science and Race, Diaspora, and Indigeneity
Susan Burns, Professor, History and East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Patrick Morrissey, Assistant Instructional Professor, Humanities Collegiate Division
Michael Bourdaghs, Robert S. Ingersoll Distinguished Service Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Demetra Kasimis, Associate Professor of Political Science
Agnes Lugo-Ortiz, Associate Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Andrew Broughton, Associate Instructional Professor, Humanities Collegiate Division
Jordan Jochim, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
Cecilia Palombo, Assistant Professor, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Thomas Lamarre, Gordon J Laing Distinguished Service Professor, Cinema and Media Studies
Michele Friedner, Professor, Comparative Human Development
Alison James, Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Paul Copp, Associate Professor, East Asian Languages and Civilizations
Jennifer Iverson, Associate Professor, Music and the Humanities
Ryan Cecil Jobson, Neubauer Family Assistant Professor of Anthropology
Marissa Fenley, Harper Schmidt Fellow in Theater and Performance Studies
Hakan Karateke, Professor, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Kaneesha Parsard, Assistant Professor, English
Sarah Pierce Taylor, Assistant Professor, Divinity School
Rebeca Velásquez, Humanities Teaching Fellow
Tristan Schweiger, Assistant Instructional Professor, English and Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Hilary Strang, Associate Senior Instructional Professor, Humanities; Director, Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Aaron Jakes, Assistant Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History
Zach Loeffler, Lecturer, Humanities Collegiate Division
Mee-Ju Ro, Assistant Professor, English
Yali Amit, Professor, Statistics
Joseph Dov Bruch, Assistant Professor of Public Health Sciences
W. Clark Gilpin, Margaret E. Burton Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus, Divinity School
Victoria Saramago, Associate Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Elizabeth Helsinger, John Mathews Manly Distinguished Service Professor of English Emerita
Tamara Golan, Assistant Professor, Art History
Tara Zahra, Hanna Holborn Gray Professor of East European History
Leland Jasperse, Humanities Teaching Fellow
Miguel Martínez, Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
William Sites, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Rochona Majumdar, Professor, South Asian Languages and Civilizations and Cinema and Media Studies
Dalia H. Elmofty, MD, FASA, Associate Professor, Associate Program Director, Pain Fellowship, Department of Anesthesia
Dipesh Chakrabarty, Professor, History and South Asian Languages and Civilizations
Saad Ali, MD, Clinical Associate of Radiology
Emilio Kourí, Professor, Department of History
Wang You, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
James Chandler, William B. Ogden Distinguished Service Professor, Department of English and Department of Cinema and Media Studies
Abhishek Bhattacharyya, Teaching Fellow in Anthropology and the College
Noel Blanco Mourelle, Assistant Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Mark Philip Bradley, Bernadotte E. Schmitt Distinguished Service Professor, Department of History
Josef Stern, William H. Colvin Professor of Philosophy (Emeritus)
Florian Klinger, Associate Professor, Germanic Studies
Angie Heo, Associate Professor, Divinity School
Andrew Ferguson, Professor, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering
Diana Schwartz Francisco, Assistant Instructional Professor, History
Patrick Jagoda, William Rainey Harper Professor, Cinema and Media Studies, English, and Obstetrics and Gynecology
James León Weber, Assistant Instructional Professor in Spanish, Romance Languages and Literatures
Monther Qandeel, MD, Clinical Associate of Radiology
Larissa Brewer-García, Associate Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Genevieve Lakier, Professor of Law and Herbert and Marjorie Fried Teaching Scholar
Rochelle Terman, Assistant Professor of Political Science
Julia Brown, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Social Sciences
Joe Bonni, Lecturer in The College
Danielle Jones, Humanities Teaching Fellow
Alice McLean, Senior Lecturer, Romance Languages and Literatures
Margaret Geoga, Assistant Professor, Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures and Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Niall Atkinson, Associate Professor of Art History
Crystal Beiersdorfer, Lecturer, Department of Cinema and Media Studies, Program in Media Arts and Design, and the Humanities Collegiate Division.
Cameron Mankin, Lecturer, Media Arts and Design
Brodwyn Fischer, Professor of History
John A. Schneider MD, MPH, Professor of Medicine, Epidemiology and Social Work
Tyler W. Williams, Associate Professor, South Asian Languages and Civilizations
Andrew Pitel, Assistant Instructional Professor, Philosophy and Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Danielle M Roper, Neubauer Family Assistant Professor, Romance Languages and Literature
James Fernandez, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology
Mario Santana, Associate Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Ruba Azzam, MD, MPH, Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Leslie Buxbaum, Associate Professor of Practice, Theater and Performance Studies
Mustafa Hussain, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery
Veronica Vegna, Senior Instructional Professor, Romance Languages and Literatures
Esmael Jafari Haddadian, Instructional Professor, Biological Sciences Collegiate Division
Jieun Kim, Senior Lecturer, East Asian languages and Civilizations
Eugene Raikhel, Associate Professor, Comparative Human Development
Prashant Kumar, Postdoctoral Researcher at the rank of Instructor, Institute on the Formation of Knowledge
Bernard McGinn, Naomi Shenstone Donnelley Professor Emeritus, Divinity School
Wu Hung, Harrie A. Vanderstappen Distinguished Service Professor, Department of Art History
Yueling Ji, Teaching Fellow in the Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations and in the College
Darrel Chia, Assistant Instructional Professor, English and Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Jon Rogowski, Professor, Department of Political Science
John D. Kelly, Christian W. Mackauer Professor in Anthropology and the College
Omar Metwally, MD, Clinical Associate of Radiology
James Osborne, Associate Professor, Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
James F. Lastra, Associate Professor of Cinema and Media Studies and English
Lina Ferreira, Assistant Professor in the Program in Creative Writing
John E. Woods, Professor Emeritus, History and Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Denis Hirschfeldt, Professor of Mathematics
Aaron Turkewitz, Professor, Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, Committee on Microbiology
Françoise Meltzer, Edward Carson Waller Distinguished Service Professor of the Humanities, Divinity School and the College
Jasmin Tiro, Professor, Public Health Sciences, Biological Sciences Division
Chris Carloy, Assistant Instructional Professor, Cinema and Media Studies and Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Kurt Jacobsen, Lecturer, Social Sciences
Augusta McMahon, Professor, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations and the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures
Brianna Parry, Theater and Performance Studies Production Manager
Theo van den Hout, Rasmussen Professor of Hittite and Anatolian Languages, retired
Anna Woodard, Research Data Scientist, Data Science Institute
Jared Berkowitz, Assistant Instructional Professor, Program in Law, Letters, and Society
Monica E. Peek, MD, MPH, MS, Ellen H. Block Professor of Health Justice, Department of Medicine
Christian K. Wedemeyer, Associate Professor of the History of Religions, Divinity School
Julia Rhoads, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor in Theater and Performance Studies
Craig B. Futterman, Clinical Professor of Law
Molly Offer-Westort, Assistant Professor, Political Science
David Lebow, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor, Program in Law, Letters, and Society
Callie Maidhof, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor and Associate Director of Global Studies
Matt Epperson, Associate Professor, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Nicole Whalen, Harper-Schmidt Fellow and Collegiate Assistant Professor, Society of Fellows
Maryam Siddiqui, MD, Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Amber Ginsburg, Lecturer, Department of Visual Arts
Paul Mendes-Flohr, Dorothy Grant Maclear Professor Emeritus of Modern Jewish History and Thought, Divinity School
Mary Hicks, Assistant Professor of History
Agnes Malinowska, Assistant Instructional Professor, English and Master of Arts Program in the Humanities
Adam Almqvist, Teaching Fellow, Department of Political Science and the College
Devon de Mayo, Assistant Senior Instructional Professor, Theatre and Performance Studies
K.J. Hickerson, Assistant Instructional Professor of History
The list of signatories above represents those who signed the letter before the time of publication (May 13, 2024). The full list can be found here.
MFL / May 27, 2024 at 5:36 am
As stated here previously, an encampment is a violation of time, place and manner rules set out by the University. This Op Ed suggests that disbanding the encampment violates the letter and spirit of University rules. It was not, in fact, the University was following their rules by disbanding it. It’s shocking to me that Professors at U of C are twisting the Kalven report and University rules. Their statement the U of C Administration took a position against free speech to decide by administrative fiat that enough speech had been heard. No they didn’t. They simply made a decision that an encampment is aainst University policy. The encampment was not freedom of speech. It was a violation of U of C rules. If those same individuals wanted to walk around campus holding up signs and making statements without amplification, without disturbing classes, they could be doing so from then until now. Instead, they purposefully violated school rules to make a statement on how far they could push the rules and U of C admins to get more exposure. This letter is inaccurate, disingenuous and self serving. If each of these members of the faculty were asked prior to their hiring at U of C and told “hey, we are a haven for free speech, but it has limits. We have rules against tents being erected on our property and individuals sleeping in them for days on end in a protest camp, but we support other opportunities for those same students to protest 24/7, in a way that is consistent with our academic mission” how many of them would have said “I’m out – no way I take this job at this suppressive place”. 0 of them would have turned down the job.
Summa / May 16, 2024 at 8:44 am
“There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” The one image that sticks in my mind from the encampment is that of “disclose-and-divest” crowd waving their i Phones at UCPD. Why? Because not a week earlier Apple had purchased an Israeli chip manufacturer, PrimeSense, for about $350 million, one of numerous active investments by Apple in Israel. In a complex world, moral absolutism and hyperbole, such as that on display in this letter, are not very helpful.
Thoreau / May 25, 2024 at 5:45 am
There are many shades of grey, my dear Shylock. I don’t think Apple is directly collaborating with IDF, supplying weapons to the IDF, or giving IDF members free phones. Companies that are directly helping the IDF would be the initial targets of divestment, not Apple or Google. But of course, if you think Apple should divest its Israeli investments, you are more than welcome to this wonderful idea and should disseminate it wherever you go.
A / May 15, 2024 at 11:34 pm
Notice there are almost no STEM professors on this list (I count fewer than 10)-it is all the most radical humanities type that have been ruining campuses for the last 15 years with their repressive notions of justice and what speech is allowed and what is not. They politically agree with the protesters, hence even pretty gross violations of university rules (and actually violations of free speech-e.g. encampments block the use of space for others to exercise their speech) should be protected in their minds as free speech, but if there was a pro-life encampment on the quad none of them would write a letter claiming that the removal of such an encampment was a violation of free speech, in fact they would call for it and rejoice in its removal. This is truly Herbert Marcuse’s notion repressive tolerance in action.
Let’s get this straight for the 20th time: An encampment is a gross violation of long standing time place and manner rules put in place to protect the free speech rights of all. The university would never quash free speech regardless of the content that conformed to long standing rules and wide ranging allowances for protest and speech, such as marching continuously on Ellis Avenue en mass in pro-Palestinian protest.
UC STEM professor / May 17, 2024 at 8:54 am
Click on the link for the full list of signatories. Many science professors have signed. I believe this letter was simply not circulated to a “representative” sample of professors before publication, so the original signatories are mostly in the humanities and social sciences.
A / May 17, 2024 at 8:39 pm
Incorrect. Of course I looked. For tenured or tenure track professors there are 3 in biological sciences, 1 math professor and one molecular engineering. That all. It is almost no one. Not sure what you are looking at, but word search is useful, I’d try it.
A / May 17, 2024 at 9:28 pm
Addendum-and maybe 3-4 total in the medical school.
Kamala Harris / May 14, 2024 at 9:22 pm
These are the kind of fruitcakes, hatemongers, and halfwits we have on our faculty.
Thoreau / May 25, 2024 at 8:44 am
¿Hablas Inglés?
Tu parles anglais?
Sprichst du Englisch?
Parli inglese?
Você fala inglês?
Pratar du engelska?
Apakah kamu bicara bahasa Inggris?
Ты говоришь по-английски? (Ty govorish’ po-angliyski?)
Spreek jij Engels?
Mówisz po angielsku?
A parent / May 14, 2024 at 5:17 pm
Uchicago has more than 3,000 professors?so less than 10% professors signed it.
E / May 14, 2024 at 6:44 pm
If your implication is that the number of signatories on this letter demonstrates that the views expressed are in the minority, I’m not convinced.
Fairly certain this is one of several letters that have been circulated over the past few weeks. Furthermore, there are undoubtedly faculty who support the views here but did not sign on for fear of retaliation. You know how certain people get with doxxing and all…don’t you? 🙂
A parent / May 15, 2024 at 1:07 am
Do you have any survey or data to support your opinion? You can claim that more than 50% of the US population supports you, but there won’t be any evidence to back that up unless we actually have a vote. The protests never had a large crowd; that is a simple and plain fact. Only a fraction of the students participated, regardless of how hard you tried to make it look otherwise.
an actual UC student / May 15, 2024 at 3:45 pm
Alright, let’s make apples to apples comparisons. By your logic, this open letter is clearly way more popular because the opposing letter didn’t even have 50 professors (Less than 2%). See for yourself on the other letter written about two weeks ago: “An Open Letter to President Alivisatos and Provost Baicker Concerning the Pro-Palestine Encampment.”
MB / May 14, 2024 at 9:38 am
Alternative title: A List of Professors to Avoid
UC student for free inquiry and dialogue / May 15, 2024 at 7:51 pm
This is the kind of close-mindedness that actually destroys open dialogue on campuses. As students we absolutely should not avoid professors based on their political (or any other type of) opinions. I personally think this is a VERY commonsense stance in support of open dialogue, ie. our free speech and more importantly our university’s commitment to discussion over institutional repression. It is not made to alienate students, but to make ALL of them feel safe in exercising their freedom of speech, right to nonviolent political action, and social protest. If you disagree with them (in the classroom or beyond), they welcome you to do so. The professors that signed this letter are doing what their CONTRACTS tell them to: support and advocate for their students’ wellbeing and learning to the best of their ability. They are the BEST professors to seek out, because they are showing that they are committed to allowing students to exercise their right to free speech, regardless of their political affiliation or the possible disagreeableness of their stances. A list of professors who would NOT be okay with *all* opinions (students left, right, center; sleeping in tents on the quad, in dorms, or in off-campus apartments; hell, even up, down, and sideways; any of the nonviolent extremes) being shared/debated in the academic space can be found on a previous letter published on May 3rd in the Maroon Viewpoints section: “An Open Letter to President Alivisatos and Provost Baicker Concerning the Pro-Palestine Encampment: End the encampment to protect the University’s mission.”
MB / May 18, 2024 at 9:40 pm
In all seriousness, I strongly disagree. Academic freedom says they can be professors here, but nowhere does it say I have to take their classes or even take them seriously. Others can do that. You wrote: “If you disagree with them (in the classroom or beyond), they welcome you to do so.” This is nonsense. These are the type of professors that will penalize you for not agreeing with them. I would know, because I had many of them. You also wrote: “They are the BEST professors to seek out, because they are showing that they are committed to allowing students to exercise their right to free speech, regardless of their political affiliation or the possible disagreeableness of their stances.” Also nonsense. When you stand for freedom of speech, you should not stand for YOUR freedom of speech (or even that of people you agree with). You should stand for the freedom of speech of others you disagree with. This is Noam Chomsky 101. Hell, even the ACLU understands this. Where were these professors when Steve Bannon’s event couple years ago was cancelled? Maybe they weren’t so pro free speech after all.
UUC Rocket Scientist / May 14, 2024 at 6:56 am
I like to walk across the center of the Quad from Levi Hall to Woodlawn during my lunch break.
For one week, that was not possible.
Contrary to what the faculty members signing this petition assert, the area of the Quad the students occupied was not traversable unless you had the permission of protestors with home-made wooden shields and walked around the fencing and barricades put up in the name of “free speech”.
An old saying is you have the right to walk down a street where people are throwing brickbats at each other, but it doesn’t take a lot of common sense to avoid the street.
Free speech is getting a permit from the university to hold a rally where others are “free” to stop and listen or go about their own business.
Several events held by Palestinians did just that.
The illegal encampment was conduct, not speech, from the start.
student / May 14, 2024 at 2:35 pm
hi, this just isn’t true, i am a student and I walked through all week, no one stopped me no one bothered me!
Current UChicago Grad Student / May 14, 2024 at 3:28 pm
I walked through the encampment every single day merely out of curiosity, without interacting with anyone. No person or object at any point obstructed me.
Sigh / May 14, 2024 at 6:13 am
I’m just a parent. A little on the older side. I mention this because at the three institutions I attended, and in all the years since working outside the academy but closely with academics, faculty complaint is a chronic condition. Everywhere. About nearly anything administration does or doesn’t do. The student protest and questions of free speech are an excellent source for entirely predictable faculty outrage. What was weaponized wasn’t the Kelvan report but the disciplines and departments from which the fulminating seems to have sprung. And yes, I am speaking from experience. And no I’m not anything close to a conservative. I’m a progressive embarrassed by the whole thing.
student / May 14, 2024 at 2:41 pm
you can call yourself a progressive but that doesn’t make you one…
Sigh / May 14, 2024 at 6:53 pm
Interesting. What does?
A student for free inquiry and dialogue / May 15, 2024 at 8:06 pm
*Sigh*… it is the *Kalven* Report. And have you considered that chronic faculty complaints could in fact be due to… chronic administrative failings and structural problems that are making it difficult for faculty to do the jobs they are contracted to do? And no… I do not care whether you are “anything close to a conservative” or a “progressive embarrassed by the whole thing.” Your political positioning really has nothing to do with your (frankly ridiculous) statement that “faculty complaint is a chronic condition.” If you are, as you say, just a parent, why do you think you know more about faculty issues than the faculty themselves, many of whom have spent their entire lives/careers not just experiencing, but studying the the repression of academic freedom in universities/educational institutions. If you’d like to educate yourself, I recommend the following book: Enforcing Silence: Academic Freedom, Palestine and the Criticism of Israel (published in 2020, 4 years before these encampments).
Hyde Park resident / May 14, 2024 at 1:28 am
I appreciate all the faculty who have written this message to the university president.
The day before its destruction, I saw the encampment for Gaza. On my way to a medical appointment, I walked across the campus and found the encampment to be peaceful and unobtrusive–I could easily walk through the quad and could have accessed any of the buildings.
In the encampment, students expressed their support for Palestinians through flags and signs. Meanwhile, separate from the encampment but nearby on the same UChicago quad, I saw Israeli flags flying, undisturbed.
Students in the Gaza encampment were expressing their opposition to supporting a country that has killed over 35,000 men, women, and children in 7 months, that has maimed, starved, or displaced tens of thousands more, and that has destroyed homes, businesses, hospitals, and *universities* too.
UChicago may not have wanted to accede to all demands of the students, but the administration should have respected students’ right to peacefully present their views on an issue of the most desperate importance today.
The administration was wrong to send in armed police in the middle of the night to destroy the peaceful encampment and trash the many signs and expressions of student views.
As a resident of Hyde Park, I am ashamed of the institution that anchors much of our community. Thank you to the professors and other faculty who are speaking out about the university’s violation of the principles it claims to uphold.
zman / May 13, 2024 at 8:06 pm
Didn’t see any physics, chemistry, or economics professors. I guess they are too busy to sign petitions. I graduated 40 years ago from the U of C.
Bob Michaelson / May 13, 2024 at 11:23 pm
My S.B. chemistry was 58 years ago. I was among a number of chemistry students who asked our chemistry professors to oppose the Vietnam War; none of them, as far as I recall, were interested, not because “they were too busy to sign petitions” but because they simply hadn’t bothered to acquaint themselves with the issue. Today it is universally understood that the Vietnam War was stupid – the position of the student protesters was absolutely correct. We now know, for example, that even Lyndon Johnson thought the war was a bad idea, but was afraid of political consequences if he ended the war; even Richard J. Daley (!) thought that it was a bad idea, and said so to Johnson, but Johnson told him not to say anything about it and Daley believed in strict obedience to one’s superiors, so kept his mouth shut.
There are in fact some mathematicians and biologists among the signatories, and they tend to be more astute than economists, particularly those of the “Chicago School” sort.
zman / May 14, 2024 at 6:47 pm
Your assumption of the indifference of your professors seems biased. It is hard to believe that Mayor Daley could keep his mouth shut. When I attended the U of C, “Chicago School” economists George Stigler and Theodore Schutz won Nobel prizes for their astute accomplishments. Richard Nixon ended America’s involvement in Vietnam, won a landslide re-election and got kicked out for a completely different scandal.
Bob Michaelson / May 15, 2024 at 4:41 pm
Your paucity of imagination is no basis for deciding what is true about Richard J. Daley. Try doing a little research before making ridiculous claims – it would have taken only a few seconds to find, for example, Newton Minnow’s article in the Tribune of Sept. 16, 1996 showing that your belief has no basis in fact.
Richard Nixon extended our involvement in Vietnam, by subverting the Paris Peace Talks in 1968. In a recorded phone conversation between Johnson and Dirksen, Sen. Dirksen agreed that Nixon’s action amounted to treason (conversation of Nov. 2, 1968). Johnson didn’t go public with this out of fear of revealing that the FBI was tapping various calls. Nixon’s action resulted in hundreds of thousands of additional deaths, but what did he care – it served its purpose, to get himself elected. BTW, Watergate wasn’t “a completely different scandal” – one of the targets of the Watergate break-in was to find and destroy a secret file containing information on Nixon’s subversion of the peace talks.
Given your ignorance of history, you should at least try to learn how to google.
zman / May 15, 2024 at 8:43 pm
Why don’t you learn history? Nixon wasn’t even president in 1968 so how could he subvert the “Paris Peace Talks in 1968”? He was out of government and had no authority. Your alleged Dirksen-Johnson conversation of Nov 2, 1968 would have occurred 3 days before Election Day. You write like some whacked out conspiracy theorist. The Watergate break-in was at a Democratic National Committee office. Are you accusing the DNC of illegally holding classified documents? What the hell are you talking about? You are basing your argument on some Tribune article written 28 years after the fact.
Everybody with a memory can recall that Nixon tried to win the war by massively bombing North Vietnam since Johnson refused to do that. When the bombing failed, Nixon gave up and started withdrawing our soldiers. He had more guts than Johnson. BTW – nobody believes that Richard J. Daley could keep his mouth shut. I find it hilarious that a Vietnam war protester like you defends Daley when he unleashed the Chicago police on your friends at the 1968 Democratic Convention.
Joe / May 13, 2024 at 3:51 pm
Since when does free speech mean a complete disregard for the rules and policies of the university??? The question is not why they shut it down after 8 days, but rather why they allowed it to begin with, given that it violated multiple university policies.
These faculty are upset not about the free speech being shut down, rather they are upset that the university did not acquiesce to the demands of the protestors. Allowing free speech does not mean the university needs to either give in to their demands or allow it to stay up. That’s called blackmail, not free speech.
Am I missing something?
an actual UC student / May 14, 2024 at 1:32 pm
Let’s set aside your understanding of morality for a second and grant you that the protestors did violate university policies and thus deserved to be reprimanded. If the university cares about acceptable and unacceptable conduct when it comes to policing speech, why draw the line at a peaceful protest and not when a student doxxed a professor back around Winter 2022 leading to undue harassment? Either the university then doesn’t maintain the “institutional neutrality” they claim, or that they’re cowards, enforcing policy only when it’s against “soft targets” that they know they won’t get blowback on. I have no way of knowing in an anonymous setting whether you spoke out against the aforementioned doxxing, but I am willing to bet that you were strangely silent about “acceptable conduct” when the whole affair went down. In fact, perhaps it’s people like who defend the university making this decision that causes them to take action like this. Now I must suspend the premise of your moral system and ask you a historical question. Do you think many of the movements for justice followed acceptable conduct to achieve their ends? Perhaps I missed the history lecture when the American revolutionaries politely negotiated to a receptive British audience that they should be independent. Or maybe I missed when Rosa Parks was not arrested because, of course, the law was of utmost morality and defended her in her fight against segregation. I could go on but I believe I’d be beating a dead horse. Laws and rules are meant to be a proxy for justice, not justice itself. There comes a time when rules or their enforcement acts contrary to justice. When that happens, we should resist rather than unquestioningly obey.
Joe / May 14, 2024 at 7:54 pm
You are welcome to resist, as long as you understand that the university is also free to shut you down. It does not make it a violation of free speech.
Anyone who enrolled at the university was well aware of it’s policy of neutrality, rules of conduct etc and chose to come here anyway. You are welcome to shop elsewhere if you don’t like the policies.
You are entitled to your opinion of whether the university should divest from Israel etc, that does not mean you are correct. Shouting Hate America, and “Resistance no matter how” (as I heard on the quad) and all the other hateful slogans, doesn’t make your case the morally correct one.
an actual UC student / May 15, 2024 at 3:33 pm
Of course we’re “well aware of it’s policy of neutrality,” that’s why we’re here right now criticizing the university for doing an awful job of maintaining neutrality. We can argue whether or not neutrality is inherently moral, and as the article stated, we should hope not to be neutral in times when there is something terrible going on. But the issue isn’t just that the University is neutral, it’s that the the University claims to be neutral while selectively punishing conduct (the protest encampment) but standing idly by for others (doxxing a professor, which I forgot to mention lead to blatantly antisemitic attacks against said professor). We’re here saying the neutrality policy is rock bottom and the University kept digging. The “just buy somewhere else” mindset is as uninteresting and unproductive as it is asinine. The base expectation cannot be to uproot one’s education just to protest an action in a gesture that ultimately barely hurts the university’s bottom line. You might as well just tell anyone who’s ever had a criticism on how society to go live in the woods, as it would be “hypocritical” to live in a society you have criticisms of. Maybe we should also have diabetics boycott insulin to try and get lower prices. So what if we are aware of policies we dislike in certain places we’re a part of? We can still attend them. The whole point of protest is so that we can improve these places instead of just abandoning them, because a lot of the time, there is no easy alternative. As for the hateful slogans point, I will grant you that among the protestors, there were people engaging in conduct that was unacceptable. Does that make it right to shut down the whole protest? Absolutely not. If the university took issue with these people spreading hateful rhetoric, they should’ve investigated it themselves and punished those responsible, not collectively punished those in proximity to the event. Furthermore, don’t act like people are upset for hateful conduct being shut down. It’s not like people are mad at the idea of shutting down speech in general, obviously there’s harmful rhetoric that needs to be opposed, as your freedom of speech ends when it threatens the livelihood of another person. The part that people are upset about is that peaceful protestors were not given any distinction when it came to doling out punishment.
a UC parent / May 13, 2024 at 11:31 am
I could not disagree more with these faculty members who seem to arrive at an overly-simplistic conclusion that speech being heard equates with speech being agreed with. The idea that the Kalven Report has been “weaponized” is absurd.
I continue to applaud President Alivisatos’s decision and process in handling this matter – and rightfully restoring order for all students on the UC campus.
Not a UC parent / May 13, 2024 at 11:53 am
Things I’ve gleaned from your comment:
1. You’re angry.
2. You disagree with the points presented.
3.
A Faculty Memer / May 13, 2024 at 12:18 pm
It is rich that you disagree with “overly-simplistic conclusion” that is not remotely proximate to what was said in the letter.
an actual UC student / May 13, 2024 at 12:44 pm
That’s why they teach here and you don’t. You probably respect this prestige of an institution like UChicago, hence why your kid is going here. The people who give UChicago its name aren’t some overpaid administrator who applauds himself for maintaining neutrality in a time of crisis, but the students and faculty who object to such a tragedy. And yet, when they cry out justifiably you here take the side of someone who would be unemployed if not for us.
Another actual UC student / May 13, 2024 at 3:55 pm
I think it’s very funny that this UC parent read a letter signed by two-hundred and seventy nine faculty—many of whom work in the humanities and social sciences—and concluded that they all just happened to jump to an overly simplistic conclusion.
These recent events have illuminated the hypocrisy inherent in many parents’ views of higher education: they jump at the opportunity to educate their children at top-tier universities, but meet them with scornful derision upon finding out that what they’ve become “radicalized”. I wonder how they deal with the cognitive dissonance.