The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

Off the (Ara)mark

As the University’s contract with Aramark comes to a close, the University should dictate higher standards for its foodservice supplier.
+
Wei Yi Ow

In June 2016, the University’s contract with Aramark will end and UChicago Dining will have the opportunity to either renew their partnership with Aramark or begin anew with another foodservice provider. As the University moves forward in this process, the Maroon Editorial Board encourages UChicago Dining to take student input and the history of issues with Aramark into account when choosing a new contract.

Dining is an integral and meaningful part of students’ college experiences on this campus. Every student has something to say about dining, and it is especially important that the University hear and consider these concerns. Students should have clear avenues to share their thoughts, and opportunities for students to provide input should be open and advertised to all.

Over the past three years, students have dealt with with dining hall closures due to repeated health violations, a new “Purple Menu” which led to a decrease in variety of foods and negative student feedback, and incorrect allergen labeling. Other problems include day-to-day issues such as the scarcity of silverware and cups in both dining halls, and concerns about affordable dining plan options for students. When asked, students will probably articulate other issues as well. Now, as the University considers alternatives to Aramark, it is a great opportunity for them to address long-standing student concerns about cleanliness, food quality, and price.

From this student input, the University should set defined standards for their food service providers. These standards should aim higher than the current ones, with the goal of providing on-campus dining that sustains students and other campus members in their different pursuits. The University should communicate these standards to the campus community, and institute concrete measures to regularly evaluate the new foodservice provider once approved.

Such standards will mark a distinct change for UChicago Dining. The Maroon Editorial Board strongly urges the University to consider if Aramark can meet higher standards on campus, and to wholeheartedly examine other options in order to better serve the campus community.

—The Maroon Editorial Board

Leave a Comment
Donate to Chicago Maroon
$560
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation makes the work of student journalists of University of Chicago possible and allows us to continue serving the UChicago and Hyde Park community.

More to Discover
About the Contributor

Board Members

Solana Adedokun

Elena Eisenstadt

Cherie Fernandes

Michael McClure

Eva McCord

Naina Purushothaman

Kayla Rubenstein

Anu Vashist

 

The Editorial Board publishes editorials that represent The Maroon's institutional voice. Seven to 10 voting-eligible members of The Maroon compose the Board. The editor-in-chief runs the editorial board, and the managing editor is required to be a member. Each member of the Board has equal voting power. No more than three members of the Editorial Board may dissent from a published editorial. If more than three members dissent, the editorial may not be published. Dissenters are entitled but not required to explain the reason(s) for their dissent at the end of the editorial. 

Donate to Chicago Maroon
$560
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Chicago Maroon Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *