The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

Flex appeal

On an already insular campus, forcing money into an Aramark-only Flex system keeps students on campus and off of places like 57th Street.

At the University of Chicago, two words have come to take on particular meanings. Aramark is synonymous with mediocre food and infamously poor service; Flex (as in Flex dollars), signifies the flexibility and power to choose what we, as students, want to eat, and when and where we want to eat it.

But it doesn’t really. Instead, Flex offers only the freedom to choose among the unholy trinity of Bart Mart, Hutch, and the C-Shop. It does not, as it does at many other schools, function as a simple, centralized payment system to pick up food or dine out at local restaurants. On an already insular campus, forcing money into an Aramark-only Flex system keeps students on campus and off of places like 57th Street.

Since Aramark currently administers the Flex dollars program, it’s not surprising that it wants to keep money within its system. But ultimately, the administration is responsible for hiring a contractor to run the campus dining system. (Perhaps it could even consider a company whose CEO is not a University trustee.) With the food services contract set to expire next year, the University should place expanded Flex options high on its list of priorities. While Aramark might find the idea of dining competition unappetizing, the expansion of Flex does not have to be a fiscally damaging prospect: Aramark could charge local restaurants a small fee to integrate Flex into their payment systems.

Since many students currently pay with credit cards––and credit card companies charge substantial fees to merchants––both parties could benefit, as the restaurants would be forced to pay less in commissions.

Undoubtedly the move would also drive up patronage at both on- and off-campus establishments, as diners could forgo a trip to an ATM before heading to campus coffee shops or cash-only restaurants like Salonica. Students tied to dining contracts would have a greater incentive to explore the Hyde Park restaurant scene if they could spend their meal plan–mandated Flex dollars across the neighborhood, while those choosing to live off-campus would have more reason to buy into the Flex system (and spend money not just at off-campus restaurants, but at the convenient Aramark locations).

Parents, for their part, would feel more comfortable buying Flex than simply sending cash, since they could ensure their children were eating well without having to fear partially financing a shopping spree at Kimbark Liquors. Plus, students carrying around Chicago ID cards rather than cash can be less concerned about having their money lost or stolen.

The U of C campus has no shortage of coffee shops, and Hyde Park has a number of good, cheap restaurants. The University should continue to encourage students to explore the community, and no doubt most students would prefer the convenience of being able to eat off campus while still paying with Flex Dollars.

The Maroon Editorial Board consists of the Editor-in-Chief, Viewpoints Editors, and two additional Editorial Board members.

Leave a Comment
Donate to Chicago Maroon
$560
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation makes the work of student journalists of University of Chicago possible and allows us to continue serving the UChicago and Hyde Park community.

More to Discover
About the Contributor

Board Members

Solana Adedokun

Elena Eisenstadt

Cherie Fernandes

Michael McClure

Eva McCord

Naina Purushothaman

Kayla Rubenstein

Anu Vashist

 

The Editorial Board publishes editorials that represent The Maroon's institutional voice. Seven to 10 voting-eligible members of The Maroon compose the Board. The editor-in-chief runs the editorial board, and the managing editor is required to be a member. Each member of the Board has equal voting power. No more than three members of the Editorial Board may dissent from a published editorial. If more than three members dissent, the editorial may not be published. Dissenters are entitled but not required to explain the reason(s) for their dissent at the end of the editorial. 

Donate to Chicago Maroon
$560
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Chicago Maroon Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *