The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

Free to think

If the Friedman Institute truly promotes cross-disciplinary dialogue and objectivity, it will be a boon to the University, but any attempt to advance a single ideology will have a deleterious effect on the U of C as a whole.

Last week the University of Chicago announced the Milton Friedman Institute, a new think tank, dedicated to promoting the Chicago school of economics, that will launch next fall. To be housed in the Chicago Theological Seminary, the Friedman Institute will seek to improve academic dialogue and cross-disciplinary research. The move has tremendous potential to advance the U of C’s role in the study of economics, but to be successful, the Institute must first make a firm and public commitment to academic independence and objective study.

The advantages of the Friedman Institute are many: First, it will promote interaction between the Economics Department, the GSB, the Law School, and visiting scholars. More broadly, the Institute will improve communication between the various subfields of economics, which can only strengthen the quality and relevance of current research. The University as a whole will also benefit from increased visibility and prestige, making the U of C an even more attractive destination for the nation’s top researchers and students.

And yet, for this to happen, the Friedman Institute will have to perform a difficult balancing act. The Institute’s namesake was one of the U of C’s most distinguished economists but also one of its most divisive academics, potentially making his inherently loaded name a poor choice for an institute dedicated to academic cooperation. Furthermore, while the University claims the Institute will produce objective research, the report preceding its creation declared that “[t]he intellectual focus of the Institute would reflect the traditions of the Chicago school” such as issues ranging from “advocacy for market alternatives to ill conceived policy initiatives.”

If the Friedman Institute truly promotes cross-disciplinary dialogue and objectivity, it will be a boon to the University, but any attempt to advance a single ideology will have a deleterious effect on the U of C as a whole. Even if the Institute is not unduly affected by predetermined bias, it will have to fight the misperceptions its name and founding report might create. The University would be wise to learn from the pitfalls of the Hoover Institution, a think tank located at Stanford. While an explicitly conservative organization, Hoover is more than capable of producing credible research and employing respected academics. But its work is often tainted by its association with right-wing ideologues such as Dinesh D’Souza, who published a book in 2007 arguing that the “cultural left” was largely responsible for the attacks on 9/11, and the decidedly unacademic Donald Rumsfeld, who began a term there as a one-year visiting fellow in September.

It is fine to pay homage to Milton Friedman, but the institute that bears his name should keep in mind the truth that allowed Friedman to win a Nobel Prize: True academics must be willing to question all assumptions.

The Maroon Editorial Board consists of the Editor-in-Chief, Managing Editor, Viewpoints Editors, and an additional Editorial Board member.

Leave a Comment
Donate to Chicago Maroon
$5513
$7000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation makes the work of student journalists of University of Chicago possible and allows us to continue serving the UChicago and Hyde Park community.

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Maroon Editorial Board

Board Members

Solana Adedokun

Elena Eisenstadt

Cherie Fernandes

Michael McClure

Eva McCord

Naina Purushothaman

Kayla Rubenstein

Anu Vashist

 

The Editorial Board publishes editorials that represent The Maroon's institutional voice. Seven to 10 voting-eligible members of The Maroon compose the Board. The editor-in-chief runs the editorial board, and the managing editor is required to be a member. Each member of the Board has equal voting power. No more than three members of the Editorial Board may dissent from a published editorial. If more than three members dissent, the editorial may not be published. Dissenters are entitled but not required to explain the reason(s) for their dissent at the end of the editorial. 

Donate to Chicago Maroon
$5513
$7000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Chicago Maroon Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *