The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

The University of Chicago’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1892

Chicago Maroon

Aaron Bros Sidebar

Fed up

The Administration should reintroduce meal plan choices to better meet student needs

According to the Campus Dining Services office, “Participating in the residential dining program is one of the fundamental cornerstones of community development.” However, even if the strength of the house system rests largely on requiring residents to eat some meals in a dining hall, the University should let upperclassmen choose their desired number of meals past that minimum amount. The administration should ensure that upperclassmen residents of the house system are afforded some level of choice in their meal-plan selection rather than forcing them to purchase the most expensive, “Unlimited” plan.

Maintaining community feeling in the house system does not require residents to buy an unlimited number of meals. Many students on the unlimited meal plan skip breakfast and eat dinner well after 8 p.m., when campus dining halls close. It is unreasonable to charge students for such services that they will not likely benefit from. Moreover, the University impeaches its own goal by limiting the number of guest swipes each quarter to five in conjunction with the new unlimited plan. If it were legitimately concerned with fostering increased social contact among students, the University ought to return to finite meal plans and accordingly remove the unreasonable cap on guest swipes. While returning to the old plan may not help Aramark’s bottom line, it would provide greater value to students while continuing to build a sense of community.

Decisions relating to students’ eating should be left to students and their parents, and the university should hesitate to intervene, especially in the case of upperclassmen residents who know from experience what level of meal-plan they require. Some students find that the dining halls’ convenience, quality of food, or opportunities for socialization merit purchasing the most expensive meal plan. Others would cook in the dorm kitchen or order from Jimmy John’s. Beyond mere personal preferences, some students’ medical conditions severely limit their choices at the dining halls. The current system prevents those students from purchasing a plan that better fits the amount of food they actually eat.

In light of students’ varied preferences—and their parents’ finances—the University should give them much more freedom when choosing meal plans. To ensure students continue to eat some meals with their fellow residents, the University might require residents purchase a minimum number of meals—perhaps six per week. And, in the unlikely case that students’ demand for dining-hall meals decreases to a point where the current system no longer proves sustainable, the administration should look for cost-cutting measures before simply passing the expense onto students. With the cost of a college education on the rise, student residents should not be universally required to pay for a Cadillac meal plan.

— The Maroon Editorial Board consists of the Editor-in-Chief, Editor-in-Chief elect, Viewpoints Editors, and three Editorial Board members.

Leave a Comment
Donate to Chicago Maroon
$800
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation makes the work of student journalists of University of Chicago possible and allows us to continue serving the UChicago and Hyde Park community.

More to Discover
About the Contributor

Board Members

Solana Adedokun

Elena Eisenstadt

Cherie Fernandes

Michael McClure

Eva McCord

Naina Purushothaman

Kayla Rubenstein

Anu Vashist

 

The Editorial Board publishes editorials that represent The Maroon's institutional voice. Seven to 10 voting-eligible members of The Maroon compose the Board. The editor-in-chief runs the editorial board, and the managing editor is required to be a member. Each member of the Board has equal voting power. No more than three members of the Editorial Board may dissent from a published editorial. If more than three members dissent, the editorial may not be published. Dissenters are entitled but not required to explain the reason(s) for their dissent at the end of the editorial. 

Donate to Chicago Maroon
$800
$2000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All Chicago Maroon Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *